| 5. |
D 2023-01-11 23:59:10 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't think it's worth adding. |
| 4. |
A* 2023-01-10 05:08:31 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I'm aware that 貯蓄性向 is 貯蓄+性向; I was referring to the fact that if you search for 貯蓄性 you often encounter 貯蓄性向.
Yes, it could be "saveability" but that's not great English. Reverso has some matches with "savings-type" which works in some cases. Despite a reasonable n-gram count, I'm not sure this one needs an entry. No other dictionaries have it, AFAICT. |
| 3. |
A* 2023-01-10 04:49:06
|
| |
Comments: |
isn't this more like "saveability"? and for the record it's not 貯蓄性+向 but 貯蓄+性向.
(I'm not the original submitter btw) |
| 2. |
A* 2023-01-10 04:32:49 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
貯蓄性 22896
貯蓄 1124401 |
| |
Comments: |
It's 貯蓄+性, and usually found in compounds like 貯蓄性向. As with other XX性 terms it's difficult to gloss. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>???</gloss>
+<gloss>savings</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2023-01-08 20:38:10
|