| 3. |
A 2022-02-02 10:35:39 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 2. |
A* 2022-02-02 10:12:16 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>principle that one is not legally responsible for failing to take into account another party is not following the law</gloss>
+<gloss>principle that one is not legally responsible for failing to take into account that another party is not following the law</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2022-02-02 09:18:40 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj daij brit etc.
only 8 results online for "rule of reliance on reasonable conduct" but some of them are heavy-hitters:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635412/
Likewise, the first trial judgment in the Tokushima District Court applied the rule of reliance on reasonable conduct, and passed a sentence of not guilty on the offending company.
https://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_en/detail?id=704
Decision concerning the rule of reliance on reasonable conduct with regard to the movement of a vehicle that comes straight from the opposition direction on the occasion of turning right at an intersection where staggered-type traffic lights are in operation
translated as "reliance rule" in a 1999 paper by a M Sugawara who quotes:
H. Nishihara, "Kantoku-Sekinin no Genkai-Settei to Shinrai no Gensoku (Limitations on the Scope of Supervisory Fault and the Reliance Rule) |
| |
Comments: |
the 2nd gloss should maybe go completely. or be entirely rephrased. it's my best attempt at explaining it but this is hardly my area of expertise. |