5. |
A 2022-02-20 03:30:28 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I don't think it added anything. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>existing building that is not compliant to laws or regulations</gloss> |
4. |
A* 2022-02-20 02:04:42 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
Thanks for your submission. Care to argue why this gloss should be included? We already have one short and one more explanatory, longer gloss. I don't know that also adding medium-length one is doing the entry any favors. To me, it feels like clutter. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -14,3 +13,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos> |
3. |
A* 2022-02-20 00:19:25
|
|
Diff: |
@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>existing building that is not compliant to laws or regulations</gloss> |
2. |
A 2021-11-18 01:26:46 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
1. |
A* 2021-11-17 11:50:11 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
gg5
https://www.refonet.jp/csm/info/law/hint3.html
既存不適格建築物というのは、法令等が改正されることにより生じる問題で、既に建っている建物のうち、改正後の新しい規定に適合しないものをさします。建物
を建てた時点では、法令の規定を満たして建てているのですが、その後の法令などの改正により既存不適格建築物となってしまうのです。 |