| 5. |
A 2021-11-21 05:16:13 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 4. |
A* 2021-11-20 10:48:28 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
e.g. 惑星食, 土星食 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>occultation</gloss> |
| 3. |
A 2018-11-14 20:37:21 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK |
| 2. |
A* 2018-11-14 17:04:48 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/食_(天文)
"1956年の第3期国語審議会では、「食」と表記するように決定している。2010年代の天文書・天文辞典では「食」と表記されているが、「蝕」との表記例もある[15]" |
| |
Comments: |
Look like 食 is more "official" (and more common) so we should probably lead with that.
I think we can drop the x-ref. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>蝕</keb>
+<keb>食</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>食</keb>
+<keb>蝕</keb>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1645710">星食</xref> |
| 1. |
A* 2018-11-14 04:16:29 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Daijr, GG5, etc. |
| |
Comments: |
Split from 1956480. See discussion there.
The refs either have "食･蝕" (Daijr, GG5, ルミナス) or 蝕 alone (中辞典). To avoid confusion I'm putting 蝕 first. |