| 5. |
A 2021-10-28 00:22:21 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 4. |
A* 2021-10-27 11:04:36 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
officially ratified in January 2020. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>Chibanian (proposed geologic age)</gloss>
+<field>&geol;</field>
+<gloss>Chibanian (geologic age)</gloss> |
| 3. |
A 2018-01-18 21:11:42 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Rather than have it hang around in limbo, I suggest making it "proposed", and when/if approved it can be updated. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>Chibanian (geologic age)</gloss>
+<gloss>Chibanian (proposed geologic age)</gloss> |
| 2. |
A* 2018-01-18 15:15:57 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
should probably hold off on this. it's not an accepted term
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/11/14/national/science-health/japan-based-name-chibanian-set-represent-geologic-age-last-magnetic-shift/ |
| 1. |
A* 2018-01-17 22:32:13 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
知恵蔵mini |