| 5. |
A 2019-02-27 11:38:41 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I see there are academic papers from 2018 that still use 斜方晶系 so I don't think we can say it's obsolete yet. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2838358">直方晶系</xref>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&obs;</misc> |
| 4. |
A* 2019-02-26 22:20:52 Nicolas Maia <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/直方晶系 |
| |
Comments: |
Newer term seems to be 直方晶系, an x-ref here would be good |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obs;</misc> |
| 3. |
A 2017-02-15 00:59:17 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&geol;</field> |
| 2. |
A* 2017-02-14 10:41:28 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I would use geology.
(Names of minerals are tagged geology). |
| 1. |
A* 2017-02-13 18:19:07 Robin Scott
|
| |
Refs: |
daijr, daijs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthorhombic_crystal_system |
| |
Comments: |
Not sure what field tag to use. Maths, geology, physics? |