JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
| 1. |
[exp,adj-i]
[uk]
《from ではない》 ▶ is not ▶ am not ▶ are not
|
|||||||||
| 2. |
[exp,adj-i]
[uk]
▶ isn't it?
|
|||||||||
| 14. | A 2023-09-20 09:41:24 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
| Diff: | @@ -5,0 +6 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> @@ -9 +10 @@ -<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf> +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> @@ -13 +13,0 @@ -<re_restr>じゃ無い</re_restr> @@ -18 +18 @@ -<re_restr>ぢゃ無い</re_restr> +<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf> |
|
| 13. | A 2019-12-03 11:11:00 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | I've split off the kana-only more-colloquial versions. I think the "ik" was in the wrong place. |
|
| Diff: | @@ -8,0 +9 @@ +<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf> @@ -18,9 +18,0 @@ -<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf> -</r_ele> -<r_ele> -<reb>じゃねー</reb> -<re_nokanji/> -</r_ele> -<r_ele> -<reb>じゃねぇ</reb> -<re_nokanji/> |
|
| 12. | A* 2019-12-02 15:47:31 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | even though it is "nokanji", i don't think we would normally keep a reading merged together with a headword with which it cannot possibly correspond. じゃねー/じゃねぇ cannot match じゃ無い, so i don't think they should be in here. i am more indifferent on ぢゃない, but given that it's marked ik, and corresponds to only one of the headwords, i think it should be split out |
|
| 11. | A* 2019-12-02 12:57:03 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | ぢゃない is pronounces the same way as じゃ ない so I don't think it should be split out together with じゃねー. |
|
| 10. | A* 2019-12-02 11:11:50 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| Refs: | じゃ無い 399899 ぢゃ無い 11231 じゃない 72991758 ぢゃない 140601 じゃねー 1458222 じゃねぇ 1103887 |
|
| Comments: | As these are more colloquial, perhaps they should go in their own entry? |
|
| (show/hide 9 older log entries) | ||