| 4. |
A 2016-08-13 10:35:40 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Yes, all mu JE references say "differential coefficient", but they probably copy from each other. Also it's a very 直訳 gloss. Still best left, I guess. |
| 3. |
A* 2016-08-12 23:07:56 Mislav Blažević <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
"differential coefficient" is a really, and I mean *REALLY* obsolete way of saying "derivative". I cannot find it anywhere but in 19th century calculus textbooks. So even though the Japanese word 微分係数 is still used today, I don't think that the literal translation is appropriate. But nonetheless, I'm hesitant to remove the second gloss. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>derivative</gloss> |
| 2. |
A 2012-05-30 02:46:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 1. |
A* 2012-05-29 23:52:46 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj, daij, gg5, eij, wiki |