| 7. |
A 2023-06-02 02:24:57 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
百日忌 263
幽回忌 0 |
| |
Comments: |
百日忌 is not an entry. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see">百日忌</xref> |
| 6. |
A* 2023-06-01 09:35:40
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see">百日忌</xref> |
| 5. |
A 2023-06-01 07:31:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think "rare" is better. None of the kokugos indicates it's archaic. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&rare;</misc> |
| 4. |
A* 2023-05-31 09:43:50 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
幽回忌 No matches
Inlined definition for the reader: 幽回忌（100日目）
https://www.city.kasugai.lg.jp/shimin/bunka/bunkazai/1023948/kyodoshikasugai/1004450/kyodoshi25.html
その中で三止は「去年御別れのあしたより幽回忌（100日目）に当らせらるゝ行秋のゆふべまで其折折に拙き発句ども備へ奉りし小冊子を上木して類我の恩と題し聊報恩の冥加を思ひ奉りし |
| |
Comments: |
This definition seemed to conflict with the regular usage of 回忌.
The only single news/modern-looking ref I found seems to be citing literature from the 1700s, which themselves are probably citing older references still.
There are book results, but many look like Chinese and/or old Japanese. [rare] just didn't seem to do it justice, but maybe just [rare]. Not in modern use, at least. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc> |
| 3. |
A 2012-05-15 09:32:04 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
|
| 2. |
A* 2012-05-15 04:32:41 Marcus
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>memorial service held 100 days after a person's death</gloss>
+<gloss>memorial ceremony held on the 100th day of a person's death</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2012-05-15 01:52:04 Marcus
|
| |
Refs: |
daijs |