Don't put in "lit" translations of the kanji used in 熟語.

@@ -29,1 +29,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">bag of shit</gloss>

used to mean intestines (ホルモン):
logsoku.com/thread/hatsukari.2ch.net/news/1303406043/
logsoku.com/thread/hato.2ch.net/news/1288259437/
detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1419570294


used to mean human:
d.hatena.ne.jp/nekoprotocol/20070405/1175761504
togetter.com/li/38019
detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1421487979
detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1357118278
detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1454118194
detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1048154730
detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1357194718
Many hits for しょせん人間糞袋


Used to mean poop bag:
detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1384900498
chihouban.com/?p=5687
kabanehosi.seesaa.net/article/188691059.html
"糞袋" 犬　ca 28k results

88k results all in all

I don't think it's really archaic. It's obviously an old 
word (daijs: 名義抄), but it seems to be currently used at 
least as widely as many other non-archaic words in this 
dictionary. 

I think the lit was helpful, and I don't see why it'd be a 
problem to apply it to words that aren't expressions when it 
helps to clarify the meaning/nuance of a word?

@@ -25,0 +25,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>poop bag</gloss>
+<gloss>doggy bag</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">bag of shit</gloss>
+</sense>

1) [lit] is usu. reserved for expressions.
2) i suspect both are arch
3) sense 2 may be offensive for all we know

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -17,1 +18,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">sack of shit</gloss>
@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

daijs daijr

"joc" seemed to fit the bill but I could be wrong