| 4. |
A 2012-11-20 02:58:35 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Probably should be split. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>では無さそう</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,5 +9,0 @@
-<re_restr>じゃ無さそう</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ではなさそう</reb>
-<re_restr>では無さそう</re_restr>
@@ -21,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2757720">では無さそう・ではなさそう</xref> |
| 3. |
A* 2012-11-08 14:32:41 Marcus Richert
|
| |
Comments: |
Should this be kept? If it should, should では and じゃ be in
the same entry? Considering the recent じゃない and the fact
that we didn't include ではない |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc> |
| 2. |
A 2010-07-13 03:40:39
|
| |
Comments: |
lol what?
Correct as the translation may be, I find it difficult to accept this one as an entry worth keeping. It's just the presumptive form of では／じゃない.
Then again, 無さそう is already there.
If you insist on keeping this, then at least add では無さそう as an alternative headword.
JB: added では無さそう. The more the merrier. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>では無さそう</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>じゃ無さそう</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ではなさそう</reb>
+<re_restr>では無さそう</re_restr> |
| 1. |
A 2010-07-12 06:37:49
|
| |
Refs: |
まず、出火場所なんだけど……どうやら建物の中じゃなさそうだ。 |