| 7. |
A 2021-06-12 07:02:34 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 6. |
A* 2021-06-12 06:52:48 dine
|
| |
Comments: |
remove ちんし[沈子] because:
(1) it's already at 2433230
(2) it isn't [note="also written 岩"] |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ちんし</reb>
-<re_restr>沈子</re_restr> |
| 5. |
A 2013-10-06 06:24:30 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think that's best. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>岩</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -26,0 +23,1 @@
+<s_inf>also written 岩</s_inf> |
| 4. |
A* 2013-10-06 01:09:20 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
maybe we could keep this entry and have an "also read as 岩"
note here? not sure what's the most common kanji, but I've
been scrolling past quite a few pictures of 岩 on google
images and none looked like a fishing net weight |
| 3. |
A* 2013-10-04 15:05:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I'm not happy with 岩/いわ being the first kanji/reading of two quite different entries. If this term is most commonly written and read that way, then it has to be merged into the main iwa entry, despite the restriction mess. Perhaps "also written ..." is a better solution. |
|
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
|
| 2. |
A* 2013-09-27 03:56:51 Marcus Richert
|
| |
Refs: |
daijs keeps this in the main 岩 entry (with an "also written
as"-note).
墜子 is not in daij/nikk but in 歴史民俗用語辞典 - so oK?
nipp says 墜子 can also mean 根付 but read ついし, not sure
whether that reading would apply to this entry as well |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>岩</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +19,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ちんし</reb>
+<re_restr>沈子</re_restr> |
| 1. |
A 2009-04-10 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |