| 5. |
A 2019-03-12 07:51:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Let's keep it. |
| 4. |
A* 2019-03-09 22:37:13 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think we should keep it. Might want to add 平方ミリメートル as well to avoid confusion for reverse searches. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9,2 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>square millimetre</gloss>
-<gloss>mm2</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>square millimetre (of the thickness of a cable)</gloss>
+<gloss>square millimeter</gloss> |
| 3. |
A* 2019-03-09 22:08:51 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
電気工事士.jp/電気工事士のあるある～電線篇その③～/ |
| |
Comments: |
This appears to be jargon used by electricians when referring to the thickness (cross-sectional area) of electricity cables.
If it were more widely used I think it would be worth having but given that it's not in any of the refs, I'd argue it's not needed. |
| 2. |
A* 2019-03-06 08:04:52
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>square millimetres</gloss>
-<gloss>mm**2</gloss>
+<gloss>square millimetre</gloss>
+<gloss>mm2</gloss> |
| 1. |
A 2009-02-17 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |