| 9. |
A 2018-11-27 11:34:21 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK, I'm going with Marcus' suggestion. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -29,6 +29 @@
-<s_inf>catch-all term for hairy (preferably red) mites</s_inf>
-<gloss>velvet mite (Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>erythaeid mite (Erythraeoidea spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>harvest mite (Trombiculidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>spider mite (Tetranychidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>cheyletid mite (Cheyletidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>hairy mite (esp. red velvet mite, Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss> |
| 8. |
A* 2018-11-26 02:22:24 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I agree it doesn't look right having a list of species under one sense, and I'm not convinced it's necessary to mention them at all (except maybe one or two as examples). |
| 7. |
A* 2018-11-25 07:25:09 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't think we should have to do a note here. What I reacted to is that this is not how we usually do these entries. Each line has
a completely separate gloss that's not compatible with the others. If we split each gloss into a separate sense, I think that would
be closer to what we normally do, but I'm not really sure I think that's the best approach either. if we want to include all these
latin names, shouldn't the first line be something like
hairy mite (in reference to a large number of species including Trombidiidae spp., Erythraeoidea spp., Trombiculidae spp.,
Tetranychidae spp., Cheyletidae spp.)
but my preference would be a much simpler
hairy mite (esp. red velvet mite)
or
hairy mite (esp. red velvet mite, Trombidiidae spp.) |
| 6. |
A* 2018-11-20 03:04:39 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK, here is my suggestion. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -29,2 +29,6 @@
-<gloss>red, hairy mite</gloss>
-<gloss>velvet mite</gloss>
+<s_inf>catch-all term for hairy (preferably red) mites</s_inf>
+<gloss>velvet mite (Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>erythaeid mite (Erythraeoidea spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>harvest mite (Trombiculidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>spider mite (Tetranychidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>cheyletid mite (Cheyletidae spp.)</gloss> |
| 5. |
A* 2018-11-09 23:25:31 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think I prefer Rene's original. Perhaps we could keep his glosses and start with "catch-all term for hairy (preferably red) mites" or similar. |
|
(show/hide 4 older log entries)
|
| 4. |
A* 2018-11-07 09:34:48 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Better? |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -29,5 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>velvet mite (Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>erythaeid mite (Erythraeoidea spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>harvest mite (Trombiculidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>spider mite (Tetranychidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>cheyletid mite (Cheyletidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>red, hairy mite</gloss>
+<gloss>velvet mite</gloss> |
| 3. |
A 2013-06-25 10:20:10 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 2. |
A* 2013-06-25 08:04:41 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj, daijr, daijs, yahoo enc, gg5 |
| |
Comments: |
seems to be a catch-all for hairy (preferably red) mites, but the primary meaning is clearly 'velvet mite' |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>毛だに</keb>
+<keb>毛ダニ</keb>
@@ -9,1 +9,3 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>毛壁蝨</keb>
@@ -12,0 +14,4 @@
+<reb>けダニ</reb>
+<re_restr>毛ダニ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>毛蜱</re_restr>
+<re_restr>毛壁蝨</re_restr>
@@ -20,1 +28,6 @@
-<gloss>trombiculid mite (any mite of family Trombiculidae)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>velvet mite (Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>erythaeid mite (Erythraeoidea spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>harvest mite (Trombiculidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>spider mite (Tetranychidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>cheyletid mite (Cheyletidae spp.)</gloss> |
| 1. |
A 2007-10-06 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |