Approved amendment on 限る.

I agree with Robin. I drafted an extra sense in the 限る entry and propose deleting this one.

I would be in favour of moving this to the 限る entry.
Given that use of "に限る" isn't exclusive to this sense, this entry is potentially confusing.

Is it a separate entry in daijr/gg5, or just a 
sense in 限る？ I have a feeling this would be 
better to just cover (with the same note) in 
the 限る entry.
Do we do "X"/"Y" when there's two unknown 
variables? I forget, but recall seeing it 
somewhere. It's not very pretty though.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
-<gloss>nothing better than</gloss>
-<gloss>(something) is best</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...は...に限る</s_inf>
+<gloss>there is nothing better than</gloss>
+<gloss>(as for X, Y) is best</gloss>

daijr: "（「…は…に限る」の形で）それを最もよいとする。「花は桜に―・る」「分からない事は聞くに―・る」"
gg5: " 〔…が一番よい〕 be the best 《for…》; 〔…するのが一番よい〕 be the best [only, wisest] way 《to do》"

It's in daij and gg5.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>(something) is best</gloss>