| 9. |
A 2021-10-22 01:15:54 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
It does relate to the field of history. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&hist;</misc> |
| 8. |
A 2021-10-22 00:49:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Yes, it's not really a historical term. |
| 7. |
A* 2021-10-22 00:08:29 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I wouldn't consider this a historical term. It seems tautological to me. |
| 6. |
A 2021-10-20 13:51:54 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc> |
| 5. |
A 2019-10-05 07:02:16 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
N-grams: 昭和史 189544 |
| |
Comments: |
Harmless. I accepted it when Rene proposed it in 2007, and I can't see a case for removing it. |
|
(show/hide 4 older log entries)
|
| 4. |
D* 2019-10-05 04:51:32
|
| |
Comments: |
We don't have entries for the other 年号's + 史 and this isn't in daij/nikk.
PLenty of hits in the ngrams but this could be down to its use in titles of books, etc. |
| 3. |
A 2017-09-22 05:17:46 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>history of the Shōwa period (1926.12.25-1989.1.7)</gloss>
+<gloss>history of the Shōwa period (1926-1989)</gloss> |
| 2. |
A 2017-09-22 05:12:12 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>history of the Showa period (1926.12.25-1989.1.7)</gloss>
+<gloss>history of the Shōwa period (1926.12.25-1989.1.7)</gloss> |
| 1. |
A 2007-03-28 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |