| 11. |
A 2021-10-06 10:44:08 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Nanking Massacre</gloss>
+<gloss>Nanking Massacre (1937)</gloss> |
| 10. |
A 2021-10-06 10:43:47 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I agree. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc> |
| 9. |
A* 2021-10-05 03:18:38 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
南京大虐殺 173271
南京事件 117856 (not marked as sens)
南京虐殺 33245 (not an entry)
It's also the most frequent word for this in the ngrams. |
| 8. |
A* 2021-10-05 02:44:00 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I still think [sens] here is wrong. The word isn't taboo (even if discussing the incident, which Rene suggested, might be) |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc> |
| 7. |
A 2014-04-26 07:26:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Let's leave it for now. I suspect the "sens" will stay. |
|
(show/hide 6 older log entries)
|
| 6. |
A* 2014-04-25 10:47:13 Marcus Richert
|
| |
Refs: |
世界大百科事典, 百科事典マイペディア, daij all use 大虐殺 over 事件.
in daij and マイペディア the 事件 refers to an event in 1927.
(世界大百科事典 says it can refer to any of 3 events: 1913,
1927, 1937)
_
bing hits
5,290
南京事件 site:ac.jp
(notice how the first hit is a paper(?) titled "いわゆる｢南京事
件｣")
5,020
"南京大虐殺" site:ac.jp |
| |
Comments: |
I think ナンキン事件 might actually risk upsetting more people
than ナンキン大虐殺. |
| 5. |
A* 2014-04-25 09:53:54 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
seeing as this is literally the last topic i would ever want to broach in polite company, and unquestionably not the term that i would use to discuss it (regardless of the politics of the audience), i think the [sens] tag is entirely warranted |
| 4. |
A* 2014-04-24 01:51:35 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
is this [sens]? isn't this a little bit like adding the same
tag to "the holocaust" in a German-English dictionary? Sure, a
minority might disagree with the amount of people being killed
and whether it was a massacre/大虐殺 or not, but I feel like
it's a little odd when the people whose feelings we should
consider are revisionists. |
| |
Comments: |
is this really an appropriate use of the [sens] tag? Using the
word might upset some who disagree whether it was a 大虐殺 or a
事件, but I feel like [sens] is more about words that might
victimize some people rather than upset revisionists... a note
might be better? [note="somewhat controversial term - more
oft. referred to as 南京事件"] |
| 3. |
A 2012-10-02 01:03:15 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2137980">南京事件</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2137980">南京事件・2</xref> |
| 2. |
A 2012-10-02 01:02:13 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Policy |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>なんきんだいぎゃくさつ</reb>
+<reb>ナンキンだいぎゃくさつ</reb> |
| 1. |
A 2007-03-28 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |