4. |
A 2023-05-01 22:01:27 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I don't think an x-ref is needed here. 兄弟 has a priority tag. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -15,2 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1249960">兄弟・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1249960">兄弟・3</xref> |
3. |
A* 2023-05-01 17:55:46 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
oops, [1] and [3] |
|
Diff: |
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1249960">兄弟・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1249960">兄弟・1</xref> |
2. |
A* 2023-05-01 17:55:18 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
兄弟 5452491 51.7%
姉妹 4884732 46.3%
兄弟姉妹 215650 2.0%
けいていしまい 116 0.0%
きょうだいしまい 227 0.0%
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/兄弟姉妹
兄弟姉妹(けいていしまい、きょうだいしまい、英: siblings)
https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/兄弟姉妹
兄弟姉妹(きょうだいしまい、けいていしまい) |
|
Comments: |
Not rare, but the xref should probably be used in most everyday cases.
I get the feeling this is used especially in special explicitly-inclusive contexts. This appears in some policy/legislative directives ("sibling abuse"). I saw as a translation for "all of my brothers and sisters who suffered under ..." in a dramatic speech(semi-figurative, members of the same race oppressed by another race. but it's sci fi, and it was a "collective" society, so who knows...). daijs explicitly says same as senses [2] and [3].
There's another reading on wikipedia and wiktionary based right off the alt. reading of 兄弟 (けいめい) |
|
Diff: |
@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>けいていしまい</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1249960">兄弟・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1249960">兄弟・3</xref> |
1. |
A 2006-12-21 00:00:00
|
|
Comments: |
Entry created |