| 3. |
A 2017-06-19 03:10:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Well a "spill" doesn't have sulfur (confirmed by OED, F&W, etc.). So if it's intrinsically part of 付け木, it can't be glossed as spill, despite what GG5, etc. say. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>spill</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">thin strip of wood smeared with sulfur, used to light a fire</gloss>
+<gloss>thin strip of wood smeared with sulfur, used to light a fire</gloss> |
| 2. |
A* 2017-06-17 21:37:07 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijr/s |
| |
Comments: |
I'm not sure I agree with the last two glosses.
付け木 has a very specific definition and it's no longer used today (whereas kindling, etc. is).
From ニッポニカ: "大正時代になると、マッチの普及により使用されなくなった"
I'd favour a descriptive gloss over anything else. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つけ木</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>付木</keb>
@@ -13,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>kindling</gloss>
-<gloss>fire lighter</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">thin strip of wood smeared with sulfur, used to light a fire</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2017-06-17 00:32:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5, etc. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>spill (piece of wood for lighting)</gloss>
+<gloss>spill</gloss>
+<gloss>kindling</gloss>
+<gloss>fire lighter</gloss> |