This original gloss should possibly be reinstated as a basic meaning, followed by a more meaningful explanation.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>type of fast-paced humorous singing mimicking the chanting of a Buddhist sutra, usually with lyrics satirizing current events</gloss>
+<gloss>mock Buddhist sutra</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of fast-paced humorous singing mimicking the chanting of a Buddhist sutra, usually with lyrics satirizing current events</gloss>

As per discussion.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">type of fast-paced humorous singing mimicking the chanting of a Buddhist sutra, usually with lyrics satirizing current events</gloss>
+<gloss>type of fast-paced humorous singing mimicking the chanting of a Buddhist sutra, usually with lyrics satirizing current events</gloss>
+<gloss>ahodarakyō</gloss>

I'm of the opinion that Japanese glosses are 
fine/helpful even if they aren't very common in English 
- at least when there's no other widespread English 
term. 
There might be several words in Japanese with a 
particular meaning, but English-language academia etc. 
will probably have settled on using just one of them 
specifically. For example, you will probably not find あ
ほだら経 called "ahodara" in English language literature, 
though that'd be fine in Japanese (at least according to 
daij). If a translator (or other user) comes across a 
text where the word ”あほどら" is used to mean "あほだら
経", I think it's to provide a good service to let them 
know that they'd be better off translating it as 
"ahodorakyo" than "ahodora". We can lead people the 
right way through x-refs as well, but they're not as 
visible and are easy to miss.

GG5

As I commented on "I think "ahodarakyō" is not an appropriate *English* gloss for this sense. For a transliteration of the Japanese to be a suitable gloss I think it has to fairly easily recognized in English, and this one isn't."

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>ahodarakyō</gloss>