I'm familiar with "curry rice", but it's plainly Jinglish.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?
q=%22curry%20and%20rice%22,%22rice%20and%20cur
ry%22
(google trends "curry and rice", "rice and 
curry")
in the us, it's 50/50, in the UK and 
Australia, "curry and rice" dominates (2,1), 
in India and Sri Lanka, "rice and curry" does 
(2:1).

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?
q=%22curry%20and%20rice%22,%22rice%20and%20cur
ry%22,%22curry%20rice%22

If you throw "curry rice" into the mix, it 
suddenly dominates the searches in almost 
every country.

I think the entry looks good the way it is.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?
content=curry+rice%2C+Japanese+curry&year_star
t=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&dir
ect_url=t1%3B%2Ccurry%20rice%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%
2CJapanese%20curry%3B%2Cc0

(Japanese curry, curry rice)

I think "curry rice" can mean both "curried 
rice" and "rice and curry", based on what I 
see in google images - but more freq rice and 
curry. also if you look at the way it's 
climbing in the ngrams I think it's reasonable 
to assume the reason it's become so common is 
that it coincides with the rise of Japanese 
curry in the English-speaking world

Either is fine (I'd say "curry and rice") but I don't think we need both as glosses. Also, "curry rice" appears to be another way of saying "curried rice", which isn't the same thing as curry *and* rice.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?
content=rice+and+curry%2Ccurry+and+rice%2Ccurr
y+rice&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26
&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Crice%20and%20c
urry%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Ccurry%20and%20rice%3B%
2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Ccurry%20rice%3B%2Cc0
(comp of rice and curry, curry and rice, curry 
rice)

"curry and rice" doesn't sound natural/like 
the name of a dish to me, but I see it's as 
common as "rice and curry" in the google books 
ngrams (to my surprise). 
I think we might as well include all valid and 
common forms here.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>rice and curry</gloss>
+<gloss>curry rice</gloss>