JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
| 1. |
[adv,adj-no,adj-na]
[uk]
▶ a little ▶ a bit ▶ somewhat ▶ slightly ▶ rather |
|
| 13. | A 2022-04-15 06:49:34 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| 12. | A* 2022-04-14 18:42:01 Robin Scott <...address hidden...> | |
| Refs: | 些 6908 聊 3656 いささか 590816 --- 些の 583 聊の 96 いささかの 28845 --- 些も 212 聊も 281 いささかも 31847 |
|
| Comments: | If we're including 聊 as an io form we should have 些 as well, but I'm not sure we need either. |
|
| Diff: | @@ -9,0 +10,4 @@ +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>些</keb> +<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf> |
|
| 11. | A 2022-04-13 17:29:16 Robin Scott <...address hidden...> | |
| Refs: | 些さか 30 |
|
| Comments: | I think we can drop 些さか. |
|
| Diff: | @@ -13,5 +12,0 @@ -<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf> -<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf> -</k_ele> -<k_ele> -<keb>些さか</keb> |
|
| 10. | A 2022-04-13 05:06:54 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | I was looking at the proportions of the kanji forms, and I agree given the large numbers of kana-only counts it's ok for rK status. The ichiN tags are indicating membership of the Ichigo list, and probably shouldn't be stripped. Leaving it just on the kana is probably OK, although it hides that both the kanji forms are on the list. |
|
| 9. | A* 2022-04-13 04:51:22 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
| Refs: | 些か 78450 聊か 11830 聊 3656 些さか 30 いささか 590816 |
|
| Comments: | I don't think there's any issue tagging what happens to be the "leading kanji in the kokugos" with [rK]. We have plenty of such entries where the only kanji associated with the word is tagged [rK]. Either way though, [ichi1] should go from the kanji surface forms. |
|
| Diff: | @@ -6 +5,0 @@ -<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri> @@ -10 +9 @@ -<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri> +<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf> |
|
| (show/hide 8 older log entries) | ||