| 4. |
A 2019-10-28 02:24:24 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 3. |
A* 2019-10-28 02:15:19 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
at the moment they're added on an "add it if you think it's worthwhile basis". however, okurigana are often dropped when compounds are formed, so i think there needs to be evidence that 湯沸 is used relatively commonly as a standalone
if an okurigana variant isn't in daijr/daijs (some of the only reliable dictionaries for okurigana), then generally it is marked [io] |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf> |
| 2. |
A* 2019-10-27 15:51:24 Dine2019 <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
If we were to include no-okurigana forms of every compound noun (組み合わせ→組合、書き換え→書換) the database would be crammed. So I guess this is
rather a task for interfaces (jisho.org, etc.), not for the database. But either way this should be made clear in the editorial policy. |
| 1. |
A* 2019-10-27 15:45:11 Dine2019 <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Kyoto/Melbourne
湯沸かし 7772
湯沸し 1891
湯沸 1154
G n-gram
湯沸かし 44037
湯沸し 103973
湯沸 35565 |
| |
Comments: |
In compounds like 湯沸器 and 湯沸所, both okurigana may be omitted. Does this mean we should include 湯沸 as a kanji spelling? (likewise for 組合) |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>湯沸</keb> |