| 3. |
A 2019-03-16 06:28:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think it's pretty clear that it's the first reading that's the focus. |
| 2. |
A* 2019-03-14 23:19:10 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
i'm not sure. but the situation is complicated because 三十三才 is ateji but only for みそさざい and presumably みそさんざい.
and みそさざい is gikun but only for 鷦鷯. the note may have been cleaner, but doesn't leave 三十三才 searchable |
| 1. |
A* 2019-03-14 04:59:10 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Daijr has "「三十三才」とも書く〕" |
| |
Comments: |
I think I mangled an edit by Rene in 2008. I think he intended the 三十三才 not to be included in the kanji field. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -41 +41,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written with the ateji 三十三才</s_inf> |