JMdictDB - Entries

jmdict 1566210 Active (id: 2166960)
何れ；孰れ [rK]
【いずれ [ichi1] ；いづれ [ik] 】

[adv,pn] [uk]
▶ where
▶ which
▶ who

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 2059200 何れか【いずれか】 1. any of; either of; (to) any

[adv,pn] [uk]
▶ anyway
▶ anyhow
▶ at any rate

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 2059200 何れか【いずれか】 1. any of; either of; (to) any

[adv] [uk]
▶ sooner or later
▶ eventually
▶ one of these days
▶ at some future date or time

[pn] [uk]
▶ both
▶ either
▶ any
▶ all
▶ whichever

History:

14.	A 2021-11-30 10:28:00 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	何れにして 31512 いずれにして 1004626 何れ is not quite rK perhaps.
	Diff:	@@ -6 +5,0 @@ -<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri> @@ -9,0 +9 @@ +<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
13.	A 2018-05-16 22:43:13 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -22 +21,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -31 +29,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -39 +36,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -48 +44,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
12.	A 2016-08-11 06:47:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	OK. Let's go with this.
11.	A* 2016-07-29 12:52:29 luce
	Comments:	I'm fine with dropping the note etc; PoS likely should match どれ though いずれ has suffix-like uses as mentioned above. nevertheless, I'm sure people can figure out which word it applies to.
	Diff:	@@ -48,2 +48 @@ -<pos>&n-suf;</pos> -<xref type="see" seq="1188600">いずれも</xref> +<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -51 +49,0 @@ -<s_inf>with the particle も</s_inf> @@ -55,0 +54 @@ +<gloss>whichever</gloss>
10.	A* 2016-07-23 12:20:00 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I'm fine with sense 3. But I have some doubts about sense 4. The way it is written now, I don't think it is clear enough. Maybe this kind of info doesn't really belong in a dictionary such as ours.
(show/hide 9 older log entries)
9.	A* 2016-07-23 02:05:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	GG5, ルミナス (both split this way.)
	Diff:	@@ -35,0 +36,5 @@ +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&adv;</pos> +<pos>&adj-no;</pos> +<misc>&uk;</misc> @@ -37,0 +43 @@ +<gloss>one of these days</gloss>
8.	A* 2016-06-29 17:40:20 luce
	Refs:	daijs
	Comments:	re: suffix - e.g. 合否いずれの場合も通知します (daijs) or もとは男女いずれにも使った。 (from a daijs definition) - lifted the glosses from どれも - basically, this sense is いずれ〜〜も - I'm a bit over my head here.
	Diff:	@@ -31,0 +32 @@ +<misc>&uk;</misc> @@ -38,0 +40,11 @@ +<sense> +<pos>&pn;</pos> +<pos>&n-suf;</pos> +<xref type="see" seq="1188600">いずれも</xref> +<misc>&uk;</misc> +<s_inf>with the particle も</s_inf> +<gloss>both</gloss> +<gloss>either</gloss> +<gloss>any</gloss> +<gloss>all</gloss> +</sense>
7.	A 2013-07-06 00:04:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	OK, closing now.
6.	A* 2013-07-01 09:08:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Reopen.
5.	A 2013-07-01 09:07:47 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I'll approve an reopen, as dropping 孰 breaks an xref.
4.	A* 2013-07-01 09:05:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	Daijr, GG5, etc. (have 何れ/孰れ)
	Comments:	I checked the "ichiman" ref, and いずれ is given without kanji. I suggest dropping 孰 altogether. I'll move the "ichi1" tag to 何れ just to keep it working.
	Diff:	@@ -6,0 +6,1 @@ +<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri> @@ -9,4 +10,0 @@ -</k_ele> -<k_ele> -<keb>孰</keb> -<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
3.	A* 2013-07-01 00:27:37 Jason Monti <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/11686/m0u/ http://kotobank.jp/word/何れ・孰れ http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch/0/0na/00885200/ http://www.weblio.jp/content/孰れ etc. These are really just a selection of the first four links, more links would follow, but I think the point is proved. See comments
	Comments:	It seems to me that 孰 by itself isn't even recognized by these dictionaries, but I'm sure actual examples could be found. Anyway, they all seem to agree that the preferred kanji--when a kanji is used at all--is 何れ, and that an acceptable variant is 孰れ.
	Diff:	@@ -5,2 +5,1 @@ -<keb>孰</keb> -<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri> +<keb>何れ</keb> @@ -12,1 +11,2 @@ -<keb>何れ</keb> +<keb>孰</keb> +<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
2.	A 2010-09-02 06:18:35 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	this is definitely the way to handle it, if at all... this is the archaic kana usage for the word, but we don't that carry so much, so is it really [ik] or [ok]? the only other example i can find where the modern reading includes ず and we included the づ as an additional reading is いたずら. in that case, the づ is marked as [ik], so i guess it should be here too
1.	A* 2010-08-30 11:32:01 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I think this is the way to handle Hendrik's suggestion at 2574840. Or maybe even just have いづれ in a note.
	Diff:	@@ -17,0 +17,4 @@ +</r_ele> +<r_ele> +<reb>いづれ</reb> +<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

Search \| Advanced Search \| New Entry \| Submissions \| Help	wsgi/DB=jmdict

If you have questions about, problems using, or suggestions for improving this page, please send email to jimbreen@gmail.com.
JMdictDB is an open-source Postgresql database and Python API for managing Japanese dictionary data developed by Stuart McGraw. More information at http://edrdg.org/~smg/. Please report software problems at https://gitlab.com/yamagoya/jmdictdb/issues or email to jmdictdb@mtneva.com.

JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries