| 3. |
A 2019-05-27 21:53:41 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
"active" is in fact a noun in grammar. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>activivity</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1329990">受動</xref>
+<gloss>activity</gloss> |
| 2. |
A* 2019-05-23 06:52:36 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
gg5 |
| |
Comments: |
SHould this really be [news1,nf24]? Doesn't seem like it's used much by itself but always in compounds. Prog doesn't even have a gloss for
能動, only for its subentries like 能動的 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>active</gloss>
+<gloss>activivity</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2019-05-22 21:21:55
|
| |
Comments: |
"active" is not a noun. |