| 7. |
A 2021-10-09 08:43:16 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc> |
| 6. |
A 2020-02-12 06:32:42 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Robin in a forked thread: I saw that Wiktionary tagged "daimio" as dated so I figured we didn't need it. (It's a JE entry, after all.) But I agree that we should have "daimyo". The macron version might not be necessary.
I'm happy to drop the ō in this case. I guess we need a policy. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>daimyō (Japanese feudal lord)</gloss>
+<gloss>daimyo (Japanese feudal lord)</gloss> |
| 5. |
A* 2020-02-07 22:19:54 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I've been doing a bit of o/ou->ō conversion lately, and I may have been a bit over-enthusiastic. There are cases, like Tokyo, where it's a bit strong to always have Tōkyō.
I see the "daimyo" entry in the Shorter OED explains it's from dai + myō (with macron).
WRT "daimio", I think it's a historical oddity. I don't see the need to have it in glosses. |
| 4. |
A* 2020-02-07 20:43:49 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
just to point out that "daimyo" (no macron) and "daimio" are both in every english dictionary i have access to at the moment (M-W, dictionary.com, the ODE built into macos). i think they should both remain as they were. e.g., the entry for 東京 is "Tokyo", not "Tōkyō"
daimyō -> daimyo in all other entries as well |
| 3. |
A 2020-02-07 00:46:52 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't think we need "daimio". |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>daimio</gloss> |
|
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
|
| 2. |
A 2020-02-06 04:05:47 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>daimyo (Japanese feudal lord)</gloss>
+<gloss>daimyō (Japanese feudal lord)</gloss> |
| 1. |
A 2015-01-21 07:24:23 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1883030">小名</xref> |