gg5

〔文〕in meikyo.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>appearance of the laity (as opposed to appearance of a Buddhist priest)</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>appearance of a layperson (as opposed to a Buddhist priest)</gloss>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>vulgar style</gloss>

１ 僧でない一般の人の姿。⇔僧体。
２ 詩歌などのありふれた様式。
３ 漢字の俗字。また、その字体。



https://www.aisf.or.jp/~jaanus/deta/z/zokutaizou.htm
俗体像
A portrait of a lay person in formal secular dress. This contrasts with the more numerous portraits of Buddhist priests called *hottaizou 法体像, which depict a man who has entered the priesthood, and renounced his secular status

“Unrefined” personality, > 20,000 n-grams(several over 200,000):
野暮ったい  ぎこちない  野暮  無骨 無粋  殺風景 品がない もっさい  もさっと  芸がない ごつい

無風流  785     0.1%
蕪雑    527     0.0%
This entry --> 俗体    490     0.0%
不意気  123     0.0%
没風流  20      0.0%

Only marked [2] as rare, because if you want to say "appearance of the laity", I guess this is how you'd do it. (It's no more rare than what you want to express)

But I'm sure [1] is not exactly common either.

I only have the daijs sentry, which says 僧でない.  Absent evidence to the contrary, I suspect any gloss of "vulgar" is misplaced in modern English.  Likely this was intended with the dated meaning: "characteristic of or belonging to ordinary people."  This will not be a common interpretation of vulgar today.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>appearance of the laity</gloss>
+<gloss>appearance of the laity (as opposed to appearance of a Buddhist priest)</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>vulgar style</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12,2 +12,8 @@
-<field>&Buddh;</field>
-<gloss>condition of the laity</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1398170">僧体</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1398170">僧体</xref>
+<gloss>appearance of the laity</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>unrefined appearance</gloss>
+<gloss>vulgar style</gloss>