JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
1. |
[n]
▶ the above sentence ▶ the foregoing remark |
|
2. |
[n]
▶ preamble (to a statute, constitution, etc.) |
|
3. |
[n]
▶ opening part of a letter (used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.) |
7. | A 2020-09-28 22:52:44 Robin Scott <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | I'm not sure how important that contextual information is but it's included in all the kokugos. It is quite a long gloss but I don't think it's overly wordy. |
|
Diff: | @@ -25 +25 @@ -<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss> +<gloss>opening part of a letter (used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.)</gloss> |
|
6. | A* 2020-09-28 01:28:26 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | My issue is that the edit removed the contextual information about the sense that I'm sure Robin intended to include. I didn't think it was overly wordy. If you disagree with that information, that's fine, but I think we need a case to be made that it's not correct or appropriate, and not just an excision. |
|
5. | A* 2020-09-26 10:29:13 | |
Comments: | In regards to the rejected suggestion, "-<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss> +<gloss>opening part of a letter</gloss>" to which Jim responded: "This edit had no case or reference. Without a reason, I don't consider I should approve a change. Resubmit giving reasons and references." Apologies, but doesn't many edits really speak for themselves? I tried to simplify an overly wordy gloss. If you think the original gloss was better, by all means reject the suggestion. |
|
4. | A 2020-09-21 00:18:59 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Diff: | @@ -21 +21 @@ -<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss> +<gloss>preamble (to a statute, constitution, etc.)</gloss> |
|
3. | A* 2020-09-20 23:45:29 Robin Scott <...address hidden...> | |
Refs: | daij, gg5, prog, wisdom |
|
Comments: | Added sense. |
|
Diff: | @@ -16 +16,2 @@ -<gloss>preamble</gloss> +<gloss>the above sentence</gloss> +<gloss>the foregoing remark</gloss> @@ -20 +21,5 @@ -<gloss>the above statement</gloss> +<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss> |
|
(show/hide 2 older log entries) |
1. |
[n]
▶ the above sentence ▶ the foregoing remark |
|
2. |
[n]
▶ preamble (to a statute, constitution, etc.) |
|
3. |
[n]
▶ opening part of a letter |
6. | R 2020-09-26 06:37:54 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | This edit had no case or reference. Without a reason, I don't consider I should approve a change. Resubmit giving reasons and references. |
|
5. | A* 2020-09-21 04:08:08 | |
Diff: | @@ -25 +25 @@ -<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss> +<gloss>opening part of a letter</gloss> |
|
4. | A 2020-09-21 00:18:59 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Diff: | @@ -21 +21 @@ -<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss> +<gloss>preamble (to a statute, constitution, etc.)</gloss> |
|
3. | A* 2020-09-20 23:45:29 Robin Scott <...address hidden...> | |
Refs: | daij, gg5, prog, wisdom |
|
Comments: | Added sense. |
|
Diff: | @@ -16 +16,2 @@ -<gloss>preamble</gloss> +<gloss>the above sentence</gloss> +<gloss>the foregoing remark</gloss> @@ -20 +21,5 @@ -<gloss>the above statement</gloss> +<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss> |
|
2. | A 2011-09-15 00:51:57 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
(show/hide 1 older log entries) |