| 4. |
A 2019-11-10 22:54:13 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
新婚 1367210
新婚する < 20
新婚して 58
新婚します < 20
新婚の 70433 |
| |
Comments: |
GG5 et al. don't have any する examples, which they often do for common vs cases. I think it's harmless, but the case is a bit weak. |
| 3. |
A* 2019-11-10 17:16:57 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
The vs tag is only helpful for EJ translations. I think keeping it here would be misleading. We don't want people to think that they can say things like "新婚しました！"
I've removed the vs tag from plenty of other entries for this exact reason.
If dictionaries like Meikyo and Shinmeikai don't mark it as vs, I don't think we should either. |
| 2. |
A* 2019-11-10 15:42:50 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daij/daijs both have as vs
新婚した = 72 ngrams |
| |
Comments: |
personally, i don't see much benefit in removing it. if it was primarily an E-J dict, then sure, but there are solid references for it and i don't see what harm it does in a J-E |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos> |
| 1. |
A* 2019-11-10 14:35:06 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
gg5, meikyo
新婚 1367210
新婚する No matches |
| |
Comments: |
Not vs in modern Japanese. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18,2 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>newly married</gloss> |