JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
1. |
[n]
▶ pine, bamboo and plum (an auspicious grouping)
|
|||||
2. |
[n]
《from 松 down to 梅》 ▶ high, middle and low (ranking) ▶ top, middle and bottom ▶ upper, medium, lower ▶ first, second and third (class) |
6. | A 2019-11-05 10:44:41 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
5. | A* 2019-11-05 07:47:48 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
Refs: | daijs |
|
Comments: | "from 松 down to 梅" is maybe not entirely obvious |
|
Diff: | @@ -16 +16,2 @@ -<gloss>pine, bamboo and plum (together an auspicious grouping)</gloss> +<xref type="see" seq="2835273">歳寒三友</xref> +<gloss>pine, bamboo and plum (an auspicious grouping)</gloss> |
|
4. | A 2013-01-30 23:07:25 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...> | |
3. | A* 2013-01-30 22:29:10 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Refs: | Daijr, GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス |
|
Comments: | None of the major JEs do that, and I don't really see much need for it either. A note may work (note that to keep the old EDICT format working, we avoid Japanese in the English parts.) |
|
Diff: | @@ -20,1 +20,5 @@ -<gloss>high(松), middle(竹), and low ranking(梅)</gloss> +<s_inf>from 松 down to 梅</s_inf> +<gloss>high, middle and low (ranking)</gloss> +<gloss>top, middle and bottom</gloss> +<gloss>upper, medium, lower</gloss> +<gloss>first, second and third (class)</gloss> |
|
2. | A* 2013-01-30 21:33:15 Francis | |
Refs: | See below. |
|
Comments: | A little more checking on your site revealed that you have the ranking entered against each of the separate entries. I hope that you will see the benefit for the novice in having it confirmed here as well. |
|
Diff: | @@ -20,1 +20,1 @@ -<gloss>high, middle, and low ranking</gloss> +<gloss>high(松), middle(竹), and low ranking(梅)</gloss> |
|
(show/hide 1 older log entries) |
1. |
[n]
▶ pine, bamboo and plum (together an auspicious grouping) |
|||||||||
2. |
[n]
▶ high, middle, and low ranking
|
5. | R 2013-01-30 23:07:15 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | Okay. Rejecting this branch to approve another that Jim has started. |
|
4. | A* 2013-01-30 22:36:20 Francis | |
Refs: | See below. |
|
Comments: | I think that is a good solution for dealing with my point. As a novice I have often found things in Japanese to be the reverse of what I had expected. Even when I have heard Japanese speak in English, they often say things in the reverse order to what I may say things. When dealing with plant life, as a basis for ranking, I thought a plum may be more important than a pine [for humans, plums are good to eat, but maybe the pine is good for making furniture, etc.] and the reverse order of Japanese things was an influence on my thinking; until I happened to look up "pine" for something else. Anyway, many thanks for that and I hope that your suggestion is supported. |
|
3. | A* 2013-01-30 22:20:21 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | -Kanji can't be used in glosses. -The order of the English phrases is the same as the kanji, so I'm not sure even the x-refs are necessary. |
|
Diff: | @@ -20,1 +20,4 @@ -<gloss>high(松), middle(竹), and low ranking(梅)</gloss> +<xref type="see" seq="1349860">松・2</xref> +<xref type="see" seq="1422230">竹・2</xref> +<xref type="see" seq="1473460">梅・2</xref> +<gloss>high, middle, and low ranking</gloss> |
|
2. | A* 2013-01-30 21:33:15 Francis | |
Refs: | See below. |
|
Comments: | A little more checking on your site revealed that you have the ranking entered against each of the separate entries. I hope that you will see the benefit for the novice in having it confirmed here as well. |
|
Diff: | @@ -20,1 +20,1 @@ -<gloss>high, middle, and low ranking</gloss> +<gloss>high(松), middle(竹), and low ranking(梅)</gloss> |
|
1. | A* 2013-01-30 20:43:45 Francis | |
Refs: | See below. |
|
Comments: | It may seem obvious to a Japanese person or someone familiar with Japanese' thinking, but I wonder if you could indicate which is high, middle and low ranking, e.g., high ranking (梅), middle ranking (竹), low ranking (松). I have probably got it wrong, but although it is clearly a normal usage and I can find the concept of "high, middle, low" against the entry above elsewhere, I have not seen any which indicates which is which. Perhaps you can eliminate that doubt. |