JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
1. |
[adj-na]
▶ important ▶ essential ▶ significant ▶ major ▶ key ▶ principal |
4. | A 2023-09-02 01:29:58 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Refs: | https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Part-Of-Speech_(POS)_Issues |
|
Comments: | Thanks. I've tweaked the editorial policy to reflect this. |
|
3. | A* 2023-08-31 01:43:23 Robin Scott <...address hidden...> | |
Refs: | gg5, luminous, wisdom 重要を 1,532 2.8% 重要さを 52,991 97.2% --- の重要が 584 5.5% の重要さが 10,018 94.5% |
|
Comments: | In meikyo it's 形動 only. We sometimes drop "n" if one or more of the kokugos has the word as 形動 only and its use as a noun is rare. I think it's OK to do here. |
|
Diff: | @@ -19 +18,0 @@ -<gloss>momentous</gloss> @@ -20,0 +20,3 @@ +<gloss>significant</gloss> +<gloss>major</gloss> +<gloss>key</gloss> @@ -22 +23,0 @@ -<gloss>major</gloss> |
|
2. | A* 2023-08-29 23:34:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Refs: | 重要 29761919 重要な 11874488 重要が 3377 重要さ 112721 Daijr: (名・形動)[文]ナリ Daijs: [名・形動] |
|
Comments: | Although this is almost invariably an adjective, the kokugos (as usual) label it as a noun as well. That's part of the reason we have stuck with "adj-na,n". I wouldn't really mind dropping the "n" in these cases but I'd like it to be generally agreed among editors and contributors that walking away from the "名・形動" is the best path. |
|
1. | A* 2023-08-29 21:12:31 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | See for example, 完ぺき [adj-n] and 完ぺきさ[n] The noun is 重要さ, right? 重要さ 112721 sankoku:形動ダ |
|
Diff: | @@ -18 +17,0 @@ -<pos>&n;</pos> |