JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1268770 Active (id: 2003281)
互い [ichi1,news1,nf04]
たがい [ichi1,news1,nf04]
1. [n,adj-no]
▶ each other
▶ one another
Cross references:
  ⇔ see: 1979930 お互い 1. each other; one another



History:
10. A 2019-04-04 01:06:06  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
9. A* 2019-04-03 15:59:30  Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
gg5, prog
  Comments:
I agree it should be glossed as a noun. As for adj-no, I wouldn't mind if it went but I also don't think there's any harm in keeping it.
  Diff:
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,2 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>mutual</gloss>
-<gloss>reciprocal</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>one another</gloss>
8. A* 2019-04-02 20:31:36  Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
actually, i'm going to change my mind on this one.  i think it should be glossed as a noun and that the の is generally a possessive, not adj-no

other thoughts?
7. A* 2019-04-02 20:23:42  Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
reopening.  see comment below regarding frequency of noun usage.  i'm not sure i agree.  in the tanaka examples, we have 7 sentences that match 互い; one is an incorrect parsing of おたがい.  of the remaining six: 2 are adj-no, 2 are adv (with ni), 2 are noun.  however, we already have a separate entry for 互いに.  all of gg5's many examples are 互いに or 互いの except for two

i'm inclined to leave it this way
6. A 2019-04-02 20:19:10  Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
i did forget to add adj-no, so i'm adding that and reapproving, then reopening
  Diff:
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
(show/hide 5 older log entries)

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml