| 5. |
A 2023-10-20 05:14:18 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5, etc. |
| |
Comments: |
All the JEs I checked had the singular form. I think we can stick with that. It needs to be case-by-case. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>blood relatives</gloss>
+<gloss>blood relative</gloss> |
| 4. |
A* 2023-10-20 03:35:00 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
We have a couple of "relatives/family" entries in here that are plural (and, I think, correct). I think this should also default plural with other ～族 entries. daijs pluralizes (which kokugos almost never do...)
https://kotobank.jp/word/血族-59668
血のつながった人々。 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>blood relative</gloss>
+<gloss>blood relatives</gloss> |
| 3. |
A 2023-05-09 10:20:16 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos> |
| 2. |
A 2023-05-07 23:00:49 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Contrasting terms aren't always antonyms. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1168790">姻族</xref>
-<xref type="ant" seq="1168790">姻族</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1168790">姻族</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1168790">姻族</xref> |
| 1. |
A* 2023-05-07 18:15:04 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://taigigo.jitenon.jp/word/p976
姻族 <-> 血族
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/親族
Dichotomy is: 血族と姻族 |
| |
Comments: |
This gets more important when you reach
血族関係 vs 姻族関係, which in anthropology and law is apparently "consanguinity" and "affinity". (There is a competing term 姻戚 to which we have currently attached the gloss "affinity". I find this suspicious. Got here from there.). |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1168790">姻族</xref> |