| 4. |
A 2012-02-07 18:16:27 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| 3. |
A* 2012-02-07 10:09:04 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5, Daijr, ルミナス, etc. |
| |
Comments: |
I think it needs to be differentiated from 茶色, and it is often used for skin. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>brown</gloss>
+<gloss>dark brown</gloss>
+<gloss>colour of tanned skin</gloss> |
| 2. |
A* 2012-02-05 01:33:21 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
in the first ten pages of google hits, there's not a single one for someone from the subcontinent. i don't think this note is necessary |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>brown (e.g. skin color in Indian subcontinent)</gloss>
+<gloss>brown</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2012-02-05 01:27:33 Nils Roland Barth <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
* Add note on “Indian skin color”
(I’ve heard this frequently used about Indians/South Asians, and this is clearly a significant use – e.g., Indian skin is not described as 茶色) |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>brown</gloss>
+<gloss>brown (e.g. skin color in Indian subcontinent)</gloss> |