JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
| 1. |
[adj-no,adj-na]
▶ dramatic (improvement) ▶ remarkable (difference) ▶ marked ▶ noticeable |
|
| 2. |
[adj-no,adj-na]
▶ (far) better ▶ exceptional |
|
| 5. | A 2018-11-13 20:04:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | No further discussion. |
|
| 4. | A* 2018-11-07 00:56:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | Reopen. |
|
| 3. | A 2018-11-07 00:56:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| Refs: | 格段 1060040 格段が 73 格段な 1156 格段の 84578 格段に 926670 Daijr: （ 名 ・形動 ） ［文］ ナリ |
|
| Comments: | Those n-grams tell the story. It's not a noun (despite Daijirin's usual "名") and it's far more に/の than な. In fact almost all the JE examples are 格段の and 格段に. I'll approve and reopen in case there's further discussion. I think staying with adjectival glosses, which is what all the JEs have, is appropriate. |
|
| Diff: | @@ -14,0 +15 @@ +<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -16,2 +16,0 @@ -<pos>&n;</pos> -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -23,0 +23 @@ +<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -25,2 +24,0 @@ -<pos>&n;</pos> -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> |
|
| 2. | A* 2018-11-06 23:51:09 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
| Refs: | daij eij gg5 |
|
| Comments: | I don't think this is an adverb (all adverbial usage I see in the eij/gg5 examples is ～に) ［文］ in daijr. Maybe we should have a [literary] tag too? |
|
| Diff: | @@ -16 +15,0 @@ -<pos>&adv;</pos> @@ -20,2 +19,8 @@ -<gloss>remarkable (difference</gloss> -<gloss>) noticeable</gloss> +<gloss>remarkable (difference)</gloss> +<gloss>marked</gloss> +<gloss>noticeable</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&adj-na;</pos> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<pos>&adj-no;</pos> |
|
| 1. | A* 2018-11-06 19:41:23 | |
| Refs: | https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=格段 |
|
| Diff: | @@ -18 +18,5 @@ -<gloss>special</gloss> +<pos>&adj-no;</pos> +<gloss>dramatic (improvement)</gloss> +<gloss>remarkable (difference</gloss> +<gloss>) noticeable</gloss> +<gloss>(far) better</gloss> @@ -20 +23,0 @@ -<gloss>remarkable</gloss> |
|