JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1202170 Active (id: 1912488)
皆さん [ichi1,news1,nf06]
みなさん [ichi1,news1,nf06]
1. [n] [hon]
▶ all
▶ everyone
▶ everybody
Cross references:
  ⇐ see: 2826895 みんなさん 1. all; everyone; everybody



History:
3. A 2015-03-02 09:41:13  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
OK, I have discussed this offline with the OP, and I think みんなさん is probably best in its own entry with clear labelling of its status. We did the same for こんにちわ/こにちは/etc.
2. A* 2015-02-27 04:46:59  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
N-grams:
皆さん	29968760
みなさん	19114666
みんなさん	26820
  Comments:
Certainly みんなさん is comparatively rare (<0.02%), and incorrect, but should it be expunged completely? We include quite a few not uncommon misspellings. Is it more unacceptable than こんにちわ?
(I remember being asked to remove the 部落民 entry on the grounds that the word was unacceptable. I didn't.)
1. A* 2015-02-27 02:46:59 
  Comments:
みんなさん is not an irregular form. It's an unacceptable form.
  Diff:
@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>みんなさん</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml
jmdict 1202170 Rejected (id: 1912368)
皆さん [ichi1,news1,nf06]
みなさん [ichi1,news1,nf06]
1. [n] [hon]
▶ all
▶ everyone
▶ everybody

History:
2. R 2015-02-27 21:23:47  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
That's what you said about 11 hours earlier.
This is a "fork" in the editing process, and has be rejected.
1. A* 2015-02-27 13:35:17 
  Comments:
みんなさん is not an irregular form. It's an unacceptable form.
  Diff:
@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>みんなさん</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml