JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1154820 Active (id: 1955256)
案外 [ichi1,news1,nf15]
あんがい [ichi1,news1,nf15]
1. [adv]
▶ unexpectedly
▶ surprisingly
2. [adj-na]
▶ unexpected
▶ unanticipated
▶ unforeseen
▶ surprising



History:
3. A 2017-07-09 08:22:23  Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
2. A* 2017-07-09 08:21:18  Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
I think this is fine
1. A* 2017-07-08 15:49:34  Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
daijr, gg5
  Comments:
Clearer this way.
  Diff:
@@ -16,0 +17,5 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>unexpectedly</gloss>
+<gloss>surprisingly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -18,2 +23,4 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<gloss>unexpectedly</gloss>
+<gloss>unexpected</gloss>
+<gloss>unanticipated</gloss>
+<gloss>unforeseen</gloss>
+<gloss>surprising</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml
jmdict 1154820 Rejected (id: 1955255)
案外 [ichi1,news1,nf15]
あんがい [ichi1,news1,nf15]
1. [adv,adj-na]
▶ unexpectedly
▶ surprisingly

History:
5. R 2017-07-09 08:22:11  Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
reverting to edit 1 - see fork
4. A* 2017-07-09 07:57:26  Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
Actually I'm not sure.
It is easier to gloss the [adj] sense.
"unanticipatedly" and "unforeseenly" would be rather awkward.
I'd be happy to revert to edit no. 1.
3. A* 2017-07-09 01:29:26  Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
I'm sure I've edited plenty of entries with a separate [adv] sense but I guess you're right; it's not really necessary here.
Given that all the JEs lead with adverb glosses, we should probably put it back to how it was. Adverbial use is far more common.
  Diff:
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -18,5 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>unexpected</gloss>
-<gloss>unanticipated</gloss>
-<gloss>unforeseen</gloss>
-<gloss>surprising</gloss>
+<gloss>unexpectedly</gloss>
+<gloss>surprisingly</gloss>
2. A* 2017-07-08 17:13:11  Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
This is our normal style
Not sure we need two senses
  Diff:
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18,5 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>unexpectedly</gloss>
-<gloss>surprisingly</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
1. A* 2017-07-08 15:49:34  Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
daijr, gg5
  Comments:
Clearer this way.
  Diff:
@@ -16,0 +17,5 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>unexpectedly</gloss>
+<gloss>surprisingly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -18,2 +23,4 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<gloss>unexpectedly</gloss>
+<gloss>unexpected</gloss>
+<gloss>unanticipated</gloss>
+<gloss>unforeseen</gloss>
+<gloss>surprising</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml