JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
| 1. |
[adv]
[on-mim]
▶ quickly ▶ promptly ▶ immediately ▶ without delay ▶ briskly ▶ hurriedly ▶ hastily
|
|||||
| 2. |
[adv]
[on-mim]
▶ indifferently ▶ coldly |
|||||
| 16. | A 2023-08-31 02:02:42 Robin Scott <...address hidden...> | |
| 15. | A* 2023-08-30 23:29:22 Stephen Kraus <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | Adding [sk] as discussed below |
|
| Diff: | @@ -9,0 +10 @@ +<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf> |
|
| 14. | A 2022-07-19 12:07:28 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | There is a good reason for having a form like サッサと available to text-glossing systems. It is very useful, if not vital, to be able to handle katakana forms a bit separately. I'm comfortable with サッサと ending up as a search-only/hidden form, because glossing software can still use it, but it's important that it be available. |
|
| 13. | A 2022-07-19 04:00:03 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | Yes, esp. when it comes to hiragana vs katakana I think "90k in the ngrams" by itself is a meaningless statistic. Jisho, yomichan, wwwjdic can all find this entry fine without "サッサと" being explicitly included. |
|
| 12. | A 2022-07-19 00:06:43 Robin Scott <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | I don't think it matters so much when it's simply hiragana vs. katakana. Most clients handle the conversion themselves. I have no objection to keeping it for now but I agree with Marcus that it should be a hidden form. アリガトウ gets a massive 230475 n-grams but we (rightly) don't include it as a reading. Once hidden forms are implemented, I see no reason not to use percentage-based thresholds (allowing for exceptions here and there). |
|
| (show/hide 11 older log entries) | ||
| 1. |
[adv]
[on-mim]
▶ promptly ▶ immediately ▶ quickly ▶ without delay |
|
| 2. |
[adv]
[on-mim]
▶ indifferently |
|
| 8. | R 2022-07-16 11:44:54 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | Fork |
|
| 7. | A* 2022-07-16 11:44:01 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
| Refs: | さっさと 2034140 95.4% サッサと 98272 4.6% ← don't think this is needed. hiddenForm サッサと さっさやれ 58 0.8% サッサやれ 0 0.0% さっさとやれ 7086 96.7% サッサとやれ 181 2.5% さっさと帰って 45250 99.7% さっさ帰って 145 0.3% daijs has さっさ koj daijr gg5 meikyo gakkoku have さっさと nikk has both (さっさ redir to さっさと) |
|
| Comments: | No, they don't share PoS so it has to be one or the other. But I actually think we should amend this to さっさと as I can't recall ever hearing it used without the と, and that's what most other references have this as. |
|
| Diff: | @@ -5,7 +4,0 @@ -<reb>さっさ</reb> -<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri> -</r_ele> -<r_ele> -<reb>サッサ</reb> -</r_ele> -<r_ele> @@ -14,3 +6,0 @@ -<r_ele> -<reb>サッサと</reb> -</r_ele> @@ -18 +7,0 @@ -<pos>&adv-to;</pos> @@ -27 +15,0 @@ -<pos>&adv-to;</pos> |
|
| 6. | A* 2022-07-16 01:54:07 | |
| Refs: | Unidic サッサと (副詞,*,*,*,*,*) Base: さっさと : さっさと さっさと (副詞,*,*,*,*,*) Base: さっさと : さっさと |
|
| Comments: | For some reason, Unidic have this adverb with concatenated と. Can we add these readings? |
|
| Diff: | @@ -9,0 +10,6 @@ +</r_ele> +<r_ele> +<reb>さっさと</reb> +</r_ele> +<r_ele> +<reb>サッサと</reb> |
|
| 5. | A 2016-10-11 23:04:12 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| 4. | A* 2016-10-11 16:00:55 Johan Råde <...address hidden...> | |
| Refs: | G n-grams: さっさ 59724 (さっさ) さっさと 2033605 (さっさと) サッサ 108329 (サッサ) サッサと 98272 (サッサと) confusing numbers ------------------------ さっさと帰って 45250 サッサと帰って 3257 |
|
| Diff: | @@ -6,0 +7,3 @@ +</r_ele> +<r_ele> +<reb>サッサ</reb> |
|
| (show/hide 3 older log entries) | ||