| 8. |
A 2021-11-01 02:50:33 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>thank you for your hard work</gloss>
+<gloss>thank you (for your hard work)</gloss> |
| 7. |
A 2021-04-08 21:17:05 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -30,2 +30,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様・1</xref> |
| 6. |
A 2019-12-04 18:18:31 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijs
文化庁が発表した平成17年度「国語に関する世論調査」では、（1）自分より職階が上の人に「お疲れ様（でした）」を使う人が69.2パーセント、「ご苦労様（でした）」を使う人が15.1パーセント。また、（2）自分より職階が下の人に「お疲れ様（でした）」を使う人が53.4パーセント、「ご苦労様（でした）」を使う人が36.1パーセントという結果が出ている。
daijr
〔「お疲れさまです（でした）」は同輩や目上の人にも使えるが、「ご苦労様です（でした）」は上位の者から下位の者に対して用いられる〕 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -32 +32 @@
-<s_inf>usu. to one's equals or subordinates</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. to one's subordinate</s_inf> |
| 5. |
A 2019-12-04 18:13:24 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
meikyo, daij |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -31 +31,2 @@
-<s_inf>used by people with a higher status</s_inf>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. to one's equals or subordinates</s_inf> |
| 4. |
A* 2019-12-04 09:10:56 Nicolas Maia
|
| |
Comments: |
My teacher mentioned only higher ups use this, and it is very rude to address higher ranked people this way. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -29,0 +30,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様</xref>
+<s_inf>used by people with a higher status</s_inf> |
|
(show/hide 3 older log entries)
|
| 3. |
A 2017-12-17 07:32:10 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
G n-grams:
ご苦労様 1046981
ご苦労さま 194247
御苦労様 34620
御苦労さま 19464
ごくろうさま 108276 |
| |
Comments: |
adding form
reordering
adding [spec1] |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ご苦労様</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14 +18 @@
-<keb>ご苦労様</keb>
+<keb>御苦労さま</keb>
@@ -20,0 +25 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri> |
| 2. |
A 2017-11-23 03:21:57 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
i agree, but it should be consistent with the x-ref linking into here, so either this should be changed or that should be changed. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>thank you very much for your trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>thank you for your hard work</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2017-11-22 14:57:50 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think a complete sentence is better. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>thank you very much for your ...</gloss>
+<gloss>thank you very much for your trouble</gloss> |