| 19. |
A 2024-04-25 23:49:38 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I have split off sense 2. |
| 18. |
A* 2024-04-19 06:08:16 Non
|
| |
Refs: |
daijs, daijr |
| |
Comments: |
2 Should be its own entry, it does not share an origin with the negative helper nor are the meanings similar. Added [aux-adj] to reflect inflection paradigm. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
@@ -12,7 +12,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2008630">忙しない</xref>
-<s_inf>after the root of an adjective</s_inf>
-<gloss>emphatic suffix</gloss> |
| 17. |
A 2019-10-14 04:22:30 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I'll just make it "suf" like sense 2. ません should be the same. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos> |
| 16. |
A* 2019-09-20 19:52:04 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
is sense 1 aux-v or aux-adj? do we really need separate tags for these?
should we just simplify by calling them all "aux" and call it a day? |
| 15. |
A 2019-08-06 07:46:46 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
No further discussion. |
|
(show/hide 14 older log entries)
|
| 14. |
A* 2019-07-26 03:30:36 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Not a question I can really answer, but I note that many references split ない into two entries in a similar way.
1529520 has been an entry from the beginning of this dictionary, and has been edited a lot. It was split into senses in early 2008 by Rene, shortly after he added this entry. |
| 13. |
A* 2019-07-24 22:44:37 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Is there a reason that these senses aren't part of the 1529520 ない entry? |
| 12. |
A 2019-07-17 10:34:11 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Just meant to say my addition was actually already covered by a separate entry. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10 +10 @@
-<s_inf>verb and adjective-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf> |
| 11. |
A 2019-07-16 04:10:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Quite possibly, but it's been there for years and I'm reluctant to chop it. Harmless. |
| 10. |
A* 2019-06-29 06:37:29 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Sorry, is the adjectival use maybe covered by the 無い entry's "not" sense? |
| 9. |
A 2019-06-29 04:11:38 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10 +10 @@
-<s_inf>verb- and adjective-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>verb and adjective-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf> |
| 8. |
A* 2019-06-27 17:29:29 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
i.e. かわいく_ない_ |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10 +10 @@
-<s_inf>verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>verb- and adjective-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf> |
| 7. |
A 2018-06-18 03:28:19 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
potentially this means a lot of changes to other entries that end in -nai |
| 6. |
A* 2018-06-12 12:26:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/28944/should-i-use-なすぎる-or-なさすぎる |
| |
Comments: |
Rene has pointed out in the long-running adj-i/adj-ix debate that sense 1 should be "aux-v". I agree. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos> |
| 5. |
A 2013-06-04 08:11:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I'll close this and propose the change to the ねえ entry. |
| 4. |
A* 2013-05-31 11:53:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I suggest adding it as another sense of the ねえ/ね entry and having xrefs. |
| 3. |
A* 2013-05-31 06:27:24 Paul Upchurch <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
As far as I can tell, we don't have anything anywhere indicating the use of ねえ/ねー/ねぇ in place of ない, and it's probably worth having. My first thought was adding it here, but maybe a separate entry with [col] and an xref here would be better? |
| 2. |
A 2013-02-17 22:48:14 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
->notes |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,1 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>not (verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation)</gloss>
+<s_inf>verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
@@ -16,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>emphatic suffix (used after the root of an adjective)</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the root of an adjective</s_inf>
+<gloss>emphatic suffix</gloss> |
| 1. |
A 2008-02-28 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |