| 6. |
A 2024-02-03 06:39:56 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 5. |
A* 2024-02-02 23:07:33 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think one gloss is enough. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>law enforcement authority</gloss>
@@ -14 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>the police</gloss> |
| 4. |
A 2024-02-01 06:54:41 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5: 警察当局には事件の全容解明に向けていっそうの奮起を期待したい． We hope that the police authorities will put even more energy into uncovering all of the facts in the case.
その言葉には警察当局に対する強い不信感がにじみ出ていた． Those words revealed strong distrust of the police. |
| |
Comments: |
I still think it can stay. Possibly useful on occasions. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>police authorities</gloss>
+<gloss>(the relevant) police authorities</gloss> |
| 3. |
A* 2023-12-30 06:06:20 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
But is the gloss even helpful? I feel it ought to be "the relevant police authorities" or somethhing like that and well, that's really not more than the sum of its parts. Currently it seems like it can lead to confusion. |
| 2. |
A 2023-12-29 20:44:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
警察当局 78727 |
| |
Comments: |
I think it's useful as a confirmation of it matching "the police". It has an example sentence. We possibly wouldn't add it now, but there's nothing to be gained by removing it. |
|
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
| 1. |
D* 2023-12-29 13:21:52 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Looks like A+B to me? Yes, it's in GG5, but they have lots of examples of a type we don't normally include. |