| 5. |
A 2023-11-05 10:49:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Rather A + B. |
| 4. |
A* 2023-11-05 05:30:04 Opencooper
|
| |
Comments: |
daijr is only giving that as an example, not saying that's what the term means. The ontological argument is a specific line of argument.
(Also, correction to my previous comment: I meant koj has 「アイデンティティー」.) |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>ontological argument</gloss> |
| 3. |
A 2023-11-05 04:40:33 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 2. |
A* 2023-11-05 04:01:13 Stephen Kraus <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijirin: 例えば、神についての存在証明が古来さまざまに提出された。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument |
| |
Comments: |
I see we also have an entries for 存在論的証明 and 神の存在証明 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>ontological argument</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2023-11-05 03:39:41 Opencooper
|
| |
Refs: |
daijs
存在証明 35,607
存在の証明 9,252 |
| |
Comments: |
gg5 has "【哲】 identity" and daijr has 「アイデンティティー」. |