累積	416,942	
累積の	28,525	
累積し	26,695		
累積で	22,308		
累積する	8,786		
累積が	5,900		
累積を	4,340		
累積と	1,872		
累積に	1,848

Probably helpful. Prenominal use dominates.

Deficit
累積赤字	32480	98.4%
累積の赤字	530	1.6%

Debt
累積債務	15972	99.6%
累積の債務	66	0.4%

Points：
累積ポイント	7985	99.4%
累積のポイント	48	0.6%




累積の	28525	  
累積の投票	19550	

The exception, not the rule. "Cumulative voting":
累積の投票	19550	90.1%
累積投票	2159	9.9%

This seems to be fairly strongly [adj-f] vs [adj-no](see 赤字, ポイント、債務).  The one の exception is   累積の投票 (sometimes shortened to 累積投票) which is "Cumulative voting" in English.  But this is different from other words, as this means "voting by means of accumulation", vs. other collocations which generally mean "all of X added up" ("accumulated"/"cumulative").

We have a bunch of 累積* terms, eijiro has an even longer list I think (6 pages of collocations, in fact, usually "cumulative", sometimes "accumulated", a few oddballs).
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=累積 

Given the fact that accumulation -> cumulative will be non-obvious to many, combined with the prevalence of [adj-f] usage, I think it's worth splitting this out for the extra glosses.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>cumulative</gloss>
+<gloss>accumulated</gloss>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>