JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1006310 Active (id: 2277394)
擦れ擦れ [rK] 摩れ摩れ [rK]
すれすれ [ichi1] スレスレ (nokanji)
1. [adj-no,adj-na,n] [uk]
▶ grazing
▶ skimming
▶ almost touching
▶ passing within inches
▶ being within a whisker
▶ shaving close
2. [adj-no,adj-na,n] [uk]
▶ barely
▶ just
▶ narrowly
▶ by a slim margin



History:
10. A 2023-09-19 01:26:05  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
すれすれの	35669
スレスレの	31449
すれすれな	1999
スレスレな	3907
  Comments:
The [ichi1] can come off the kanji. In the source it only had kana.
I think the adj-na can be dropped, but apart from clutter it's not a big deal.
  Diff:
@@ -7 +6,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
9. A* 2023-09-19 00:06:48  Stephen Kraus <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
re: [ichi1] with [rK] tags, see the discussion here
https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/100

> are we still putting nokanji on katakana?
Yes, looks good to me
8. A* 2023-09-18 23:54:03  Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
koj
すれ‐すれ 【摩れ摩れ・擦れ擦れ】
摩れ摩れ 0 ngrams

kenkyusha 
すれすれ【擦れ擦れ】
「すれすれ」「スレスレ」と書くことが多い。
スレスレ 88405 ngrams
スレスレの 31449
スレスレに 8250

meikyo
すれ‐すれ
名・形動
すれすれな 1999
スレスレな 3907
  Comments:
probably okay to leave adj-na on it.

not sure if ichi1 can/should be removed because it comes from a particular list

are we still putting nokanji on katakana?
  Diff:
@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>摩れ摩れ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +17,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スレスレ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +35 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
7. A* 2023-09-18 23:33:15  Stephen Kraus <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
[ichi1] can be dropped from 擦れ擦れ
6. A 2023-09-18 06:13:09  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
(show/hide 5 older log entries)

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml