| 6. |
A 2023-08-05 07:27:46 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
JEs all have "afterimage".
after image 36061
afterimage 158496 |
| |
Comments: |
Not sure it's needed. Harmless, I guess. |
| 5. |
A* 2023-08-05 07:21:26
|
| |
Comments: |
It's common to use the term as both words so this update is just to make finding the definition and word easier. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>after image</gloss> |
| 4. |
A 2022-05-05 04:05:56 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 3. |
A* 2022-05-04 13:21:26 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
gg5, daij |
| |
Comments: |
I don't think "imprint" is ever used with this meaning. The JEs don't have it. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&psych;</field>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>imprint</gloss> |
| 2. |
A 2010-09-29 02:36:11 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>afterimage, imprint</gloss>
+<gloss>afterimage</gloss>
+<gloss>imprint</gloss> |
|
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
| 1. |
A* 2010-09-28 13:16:57 Trevor <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
"imprint" seems like a suitable alternative to "afterimage" - which I believe can sound a bit stiff |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>afterimage</gloss>
+<gloss>afterimage, imprint</gloss> |