| 4. |
A 2023-06-02 05:15:50 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Yes, the で is often dropped. I think the entry is OK as-is. |
| 3. |
A* 2023-05-31 07:12:46 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
熊野詣 13716 71.4%
熊野詣で 5498 28.6%
===
熊野詣で 5498 11.0%
熊野詣 13716 27.4%
熊野三山 28890 57.7%
熊野三社 1965 3.9% |
| |
Comments: |
daijs has the で, but the trailing で seems generally not required on 詣で terms. As an extreme example:
熊野詣の湯垢離場 204 54.5%
熊野詣での湯垢離場 170 45.5%
で seems to be applied somewhat haphazardly in the wikipedia article (sometimes there is a coincidental particle で, usually it is omitted, but it appears in some special cases).
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/熊野三山#熊野信仰
I'm also changing the xref from 熊野三社 to the more popular 熊野三山(wikipedia headword).
Along with daijs, an NHK article includes the で(though many other news sources do not). I guess I'll consider this "prescriptively preferred", or something like that. But ngrams suggest that the bare 熊野詣 should lead. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>熊野詣</keb>
@@ -12,2 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2827497">熊野三社</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2827497">熊野三社</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827498">熊野三山</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827498">熊野三山</xref> |
| 2. |
A 2015-08-06 09:49:07 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 1. |
A* 2015-08-06 09:21:30 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj |