| 3. |
A 2023-05-09 22:10:18 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't think the x-ref is needed. It doesn't contain any extra information. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1211560">完備・かんび・2</xref> |
| 2. |
A 2023-05-08 10:49:28 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Reverso |
| |
Comments: |
Sorry to be slow on this. I see the reference is quoting a computer dictionary, but the Reverso matches are largely mathematical.
I think it's ok, esp. as it refers to a later sense of 完備. There isn't a strict count for n-grams - it depends on the case. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1211560">完備・かんび・2</xref> |
| 1. |
A* 2023-04-02 10:58:13 mark dufour <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/完備性 |
| |
Comments: |
a+b, google ngram 1911. is there a rule for how common an a+b should be for inclusion, or is it more about obviousness? |