JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
| 1. |
[v5r,vt]
[rare]
▶ to snip (off) ▶ to nip off ▶ to clip off ▶ to trim off |
|
| 8. | A 2023-03-29 20:13:31 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | Thanks. I meant to remove that. |
|
| 7. | A* 2023-03-29 20:09:46 Stephen Kraus <...address hidden...> | |
| Refs: | 剪み切る is in daijr, koj, gg5, and mentioned in shinmeikai |
|
| Diff: | @@ -12 +11,0 @@ -<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> |
|
| 6. | A 2023-03-29 20:06:42 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | Welcome to the interesting world of 複合動詞. Yes, it's rare but there is no evidence it's an abbreviation of はさみで切る. |
|
| Diff: | @@ -21 +20,0 @@ -<s_inf>shortened form of the common はさみで切る</s_inf> |
|
| 5. | D* 2023-03-29 14:26:52 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | (sorry for the double-post, the whole intention was to keep my edit, and secondarily vote to delete) ルミネ and GG5 notwithstanding, if there isn't other evidence that this is a "word", I don't think we want to treat every occurrence of a dropped を、で、が、の etc. as a "word" (especially when rare). Perhaps I have misread/mis-researched this term, but this is what it appears to me to be. If it stays, I stand by my suggestion that this have a [note] giving the common form (not sure of the optimal wording). We can't xref, because ハサミで切る would never pass an obviousness test(nor do I think it should). |
|
| 4. | A* 2023-03-29 14:25:38 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...> | |
| Comments: | Forgot [sK] |
|
| Diff: | @@ -12 +12 @@ -<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf> +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> |
|
| (show/hide 3 older log entries) | ||