5. |
A 2023-02-22 18:40:34 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
No point in having a form as a search key if nobody will come across it in the first place. Not even in nikk. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>含羞屋</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> |
4. |
A* 2023-02-22 17:44:30 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
はにかみ屋さん 2434 46.7%
はにかみやさん 1732 33.2%
ハニカミ屋さん 790 15.2%
ハニカミやさん 201 3.9%
ハニカミヤさん 53 1.0%
はにかみ屋 7025 48.3%
はにかみや 5067 34.8%
ハニカミ屋 1766 12.1%
ハニカミや 492 3.4%
ハニカミヤ 191 1.3% |
|
Comments: |
15~20% katakana somewhere, I think this is enough to warrant displaying kana as a commonly accepted form? |
|
Diff: |
@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ハニカミ屋</keb> |
3. |
A* 2023-02-22 17:01:01 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
はにかみ屋 7025 58.1%
はにかみや 5067 41.9%
含羞屋 0 0.0%
はにかみ屋: kanji forms not given
https://kotobank.jp/word/はにかみ屋-603850#:~:text=〘名〙 (形動),はずかしがりや。 |
|
Comments: |
add [sK]
This is what I didn't want to see (kanji falling out of the dictionary), but this does indeed appear to be super-rare, verging on historical trivia.
含羞 was already [sK]'d out of はにかむ, so I can't see how it should be listed here.
daijisen does not list the kanji form. You can find the form in very old writing if you look hard, it seems, but exceptionally rare. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> |
2. |
A 2012-08-11 22:39:39 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
GG5, etc. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>shy</gloss>
+<gloss>bashful person</gloss> |
1. |
A* 2012-08-11 17:20:07
|
|
Diff: |
@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>含羞屋</keb> |